In 2017 and 2018, the Baker administration’s Department of Energy Resources solicited long-term proposals for Massachusetts offshore wind-power. They came in at much lower rates than ones in 2012 from the failed Cape Wind project, cancelled in 2015. Vineyard Wind, the contractor designated in May, 2018, would provide a significant share of the state’s electricity–around twice as much as Cape Wind.
Massachusetts has the largest offshore wind energy potential of any U.S. state, estimated by NREL at more than 1,000 TWh per year. Vineyard Wind of New Bedford, MA, plans to install about 100 turbines rated at 8 MW each–with blade tips reaching about 700 feet above the water–in an area of about 250 square miles commencing about 15 statute miles south of Martha’s Vineyard. Water depths there span about 120 to 160 feet. Environmental disputes over interference with fishing and over routes for the main power cables continue.
Vineyard Wind estimates a capacity factor of at least 45 percent, which would yield at least 3.15 TWh per year–equivalent to about 6.5 percent of the electricity used by Massachusetts retail customers in 2015, the latest year in state reports. If operating today, the proposed project would be the world’s largest offshore wind farm.
According to the agency, over 20 years Vineyard Wind would charge an average wholesale rate of $0.084 per kWh, adjusted to 2017 dollars. By way of comparison, ISO New England reported that the average wholesale rate for electricity delivered during 2017 to northeastern Massachusetts, including Boston, was $0.034 per kWh. According to 2012 agreements–now cancelled–Cape Wind would have charged $0.194 per kWh in 2017.
Analysis: Rather than tell what Massachusetts electricity customers have actually paid for wholesale electricity, the Department of Energy Resources offered a wordy argument about what they might pay during years of the proposed Vineyard Wind contracts. Most so-called “business reporters” parroted agency arguments and did not investigate them.
The agency claimed an average rate of $0.079 per kWh for other sources of electricity during the proposed 20 years, but it presented neither data nor methods to support the claim. Using net present value, the agency also estimated a different and lower rate for electricity from Vineyard Wind, but again it provided neither data nor methods to support the estimate.
Actual, inflation-adjusted average wholesale electricity rates, reported for the region by ISO New England, declined during 2003 through 2017. They fell from around 8 cents per kWh in the early years of that period to around 4 cents per kWh in the most recent years. The rate history provides no support for a claim by the state Department of Energy Resources that rates over subsequent years will again rise to average about 8 cents per kWh over 20 years.
The agency has not supported its claims with data and methods. Based on actual and recent data, Vineyard Wind’s output and pricing would raise Massachusetts wholesale electricity rates over 20 years by an average of about $0.0033 per kWh above the average rate for 2017 reported by ISO New England. Although it got lower rates for offshore wind-power from Vineyard Wind than proposed six years earlier by Cape Wind, the Baker administration did not achieve parity with recent wholesale electricity rates.
Background: For 2015, the latest year in published state reports, Massachusetts sites generated 2.65 TWh (43 percent) out of 6.23 TWh in total renewable energy supplied to Massachusetts retail customers. Within that total, 2.52 TWh came from wind (Massachusetts 18 percent), and 1.20 TWh came from solar (Massachusetts 94 percent). The rest, 2.51 TWh, mostly came from hydropower, landfill methane, waste burning and efficiencies of combined heat and power. During 2015, Massachusetts retail electricity customers used 48.0 TWh in all. About 13 percent of the state’s retail electricity came from renewable sources.
Massachusetts suppliers of retail electricity currently obtain so-called “Renewable Energy Credits” to satisfy six standards under state laws and regulations: Renewable Portfolio Standard Class I (2003), Class II (2009), Solar Carve-Out I (2010) and Solar Carve-Out II (2014), Waste Energy (2010) and Alternative Energy (2010). Federal reports on Massachusetts electricity measure only in-state generation and do not acknowledge some sources credited by the state, such as combined heat and power efficiencies.
The Baker and Patrick administrations have tried to develop new sources of renewable energy needed under laws enacted in 1997, 2008, 2012, 2014 and 2016–the middle three during the Patrick administration. The Patrick administration tended to focus on expanding capacity, while the Baker administration has tended to focus on holding down rates. Thus Baker’s agents strain to show that Vineyard Wind will somehow save money.
– Craig Bolon, Brookline, MA, September 28, 2018
Massachusetts offshore wind farm forecasts incredibly low rates, National Wind Watch (Eric Rosenbloon, Kirby, VT, and Rowe, MA), August 29, 2018
Kristen Young, Cape Cod Times (Hyannis, MA), Petition mobilizes opponents of Vineyard Wind power cable in Yarmouth, South Coast Today (Orleans, MA), August 29, 2018
Julia Pyper, First large U.S. offshore-wind project sets record-low price, Greentech Media (Boston, MA), August 1, 2018
Jim Efstathiou, Jr., First big U.S. offshore wind farm to charge 6.5 cents per kwh, Bloomberg News, August 1, 2018
Petitions for approval of proposed long-term contracts for offshore wind energy, Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, August 1, 2018
Alex Kuffner, Vineyard Wind still at odds with Rhode Island fishermen over turbines, Providence (RI) Journal, July 29, 2018
Michael Kuser, Massachusetts and Rhode Island pick 1,200 MW in offshore wind bids, RTO Insider (Potomac, MD), May 23, 2018
Jon Chesto, Two big wind farms to rise off coast of Martha’s Vineyard, Boston Globe, May 23, 2018
Construction and operations plan, Vol. 1, Vineyard Wind, U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, March 15, 2018 (draft). Map, see Fig. 1.1-1 on p. 1-2. Capacity factor, see p. 1-7. Blade tip height, see p. 3-4.
New England’s wholesale electricity prices in 2017 were the second-lowest since 2003, ISO New England, March 6, 2018
Wholesale electricity rates for 2017, ISO New England, January, 2018 (CSV format)
Plans for Vineyard Wind, U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, December, 2017
David R. Borges et al., Vineyard Wind contribution to employment and economic development, 800 MW proposal, University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth Public Policy Center, December, 2017
Compliance report for 2015, Massachusetts renewable and alternative energy portfolio standards, Department of Energy Resources, October 10, 2017
Requests for proposals, Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, June 29, 2017
Pat Knight et al., An analysis of the Massachusetts Renewable Portfolio Standard, Northeast Clean Energy Council, 2017
Walter Musial et al., 2016 Offshore wind energy resource assessment for the United States, Report NREL-TP-5000-66599, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, September, 2016. Potential by states, Fig. ES-4, p. viii
Jim O’Sullivan, Two utilities opt out of Cape Wind, Boston Globe, January 7, 2015
Bob Salsberg and Jay Lindsay, Associated Press, Utilities agree to buy Cape Wind power in merger, Boston Globe, February 15, 2012
Massachusetts Clean Energy Act, St. 2018, C. 227
Massachusetts Energy Diversity Act, St. 2016, C. 188
Massachusetts Renewable Thermal Act, St. 2014, C. 251
Massachusetts Competitively Priced Electricity Act, St. 2012, C. 209
Massachusetts Green Communities Act, St. 2008, C. 168
Massachusetts Electricity Restructuring Act, St. 1997, C. 164
Craig Bolon, Wind energy: broken promises, Brookline Beacon, January 2, 2018
Craig Bolon, New England energy: wobbly progress, Brookline Beacon, January 12, 2015